Quantcast
Channel: Supremacy 1914 Forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 23762

Why can't a three player group end a game?

$
0
0
Not for the first time in a game I find myself having made alliances with two others and together we have conquered the map. However, none of us have made the magic 1,000 GM mark so can't win the game.

I know we could all retire, but this feels like an unsatisfactory end to a great game. Besides there are medals and ribbons which you don't receive if you retire, so I'd lose the chance to get these.

Over the last week I have seen my score drop from 920 points to 890, despite building like it's going out of fashion. In many provinces I'm running out of scope to build. Declaring war on the weakest player seems like a cowardly act and war on the next strongest suicide as the other two combined could probably take me.

When will we get another way to end games like these? A quasi declared allied victory or an accelerated points system for development if know body has attacked/moved for a week. Anything to stop the situation were I check in on the game daily to see nothing happening. It's almost enough to make me look elsewhere for games to play

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 23762

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>